Agriculture and forestry

Matsera Olha Olehivna – Assistant of the Agriculture, Soil Science and Agrochemistry Department at Vinnytsia National Agrarian University (21008, Vinnytsia, Soniachna Str. 3., e-mail: matsera.olga.vnau@gmail.com).

In the article economic estimation of elements of technology of growing of winter rape is carried out; crop yields, product costs, production costs, cost, net profit and profitability are taken into account. The literature on the problem of research has been processed, the importance and relevance of studying the economic efficiency of the applied technologies of winter rape cultivation in the conditions of the Right-bank Forest-steppe of Ukraine are presented. It is indicated on the low economic results of farming in the agrarian sector of Ukraine and the possibility of increasing the efficiency of growing winter rape with both intensive, extensive and resource-saving technologies.

The results of studying the influence of the time of sowing and different norms of mineral fertilizers on the formation of indicators of economic efficiency of winter rape hybrids of various ripeness groups were analyzed. Significant influence of the investigated elements of technology on the main indicators of economic efficiency is noted; It was established that the change in the level of yield obtained by hybrids caused a change in the indicators of economic efficiency.

So among the investigated variants of the maximum value of the value of gross output of the hybrid of winter rape, Exotic - 22550.0 UAH. was received at the first deadline of August 10 in the version with the introduction of N240P120K240, the minimum value of the value of gross output - 4675.0 UAH. received on the third term of September 5 in the version without fertilizers. The value of the gross output of the Excel hybrid maximum value is 20,900 UAH. acquired for the second term of sowing August 21 in a variant with maximum fertilization. The greatest value of the production of the hybrid Exagon - 20,900 UAH. was received for the second sowing of the sowing on August 21 with the introduction of N240P120K240, the minimum - 4235 UAH. - on the first date of sowing in the variant without the introduction of fertilizers. The comparative estimation of the indices of the three hybrids under investigation showed that the maximum cost of production was 22550 UAH. was obtained when growing the Exotic hybrid at the first sowing date on August 10 at maximum fertilization. The minimum value of cost is 2864.6 UAH. for 1 ton of seeds, the net profit is 10805.2 UAH. / ha and the profitability level - 92% was obtained in the same variant.

1.Kaletnik H.M. (2008). Rozvytok rynku biopalyva v Ukraini: Monohrafiia[The development of biofuels market in Ukraine. Monography]. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka. [in Ukrainian].

2.Rop S. Yu. (2016). Optymizatsiia elementiv tekhnolohii vyroshchuvannia ripaku ozymoho na nasinnia v umovakh zakhidnoho lisostepu Ukrainy [Optimization of the elements of the technology of growing winter rape on seeds in the conditions of thewestern forest-steppe of Ukraine]. dys… kand. s.-h. nauk: spets. 06.01.05 –Selekciya ta nasinnycztvo. Natsionalna akademiia ahrarnykh nauk Ukrainy. Instytut silskoho hospodarstva karpatskoho rehionu. Obroshyno. [in Ukrainian].

3.Halushko V. P., Danilochkina O. V., Naumenko V. M. (2014). Vplyv resursnoho  (finansovo-kredytnoho)  zabezpechenniana  efektyvnist   ta   priorytetnist  vyroshchuvannia silskohospodarskykh kultur. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannia Ukrainy. Seriia: Ekonomika, ahrarnyi menedzhment, biznes. [Influence of resource (financial and credit) on efficiency and priority of growing of crops. Scientific herald of the National University of Bioresources and Nature Management of Ukraine. Series: Economics, agrarian management, business]  Issue. 200 (2). 66-71. [in Ukrainian].

4.Hreshchak M. H. (2000). Ekonomika pidpryiemstva. [Economy of the enterprise]: Pidruchnyk. Kyivskyi natsionalnyi ekonomichnyi un-t. 2. Vyd., pererob. Ta dop. Kyiv.: KNEU. [in Ukrainian].

5.Malik M. Y. (2005). Metodychni pidkhody do orhanizatsii marketynhu innovatsii naukoiemnoho rynku ahropromyslovoho vyrobnytstva. Ekonomika APK [Methodical approaches to the organization of marketing of innovations in the knowledge-based market of agro-industrial production]. Economy of agroindustrial complex – Economy of agroindustrial complex. 8.  22-26. [in Ukrainian].

6.Pastukhov V.I. (2010). Enerhetychna i ekonomichna otsinka kompleksu vitchyznianykh i zarubizhnykh mashyn dlia volohozberihaiuchoi tekhnolohii vyroshchuvannia ozymoho ripaku v Stepu Ukrainy [Energy and economic assessment of a complex of domestic and foreign machines for moisture conservation technology of winter rape growing in the Steppe of Ukraine]. KhNTUSH im. P. V. Vasylenka. [in Ukrainian]. 

7.Pokropyvnyi S. F. (2000). Ekonomika pidpryiemstv[Economy of the enterprise]. KNEU. [in Ukrainian].  

8.Kokovikhin S. V., Donets A. O., Husiev M. H., Fedorchuk M. I. et al. (2012). Ahrotekhnichni ta orhanizatsiino-ekonomichni aspekty vyrobnytstva ripaku v umovakh pivdnia Ukrainy: monohrafiia [Agrotechnical, organizational and economic aspects of rape production in the south of Ukraine: monography]. Kherson: Ailant. [in Ukrainian].  

9.Sabluk P. T. (2005). Tekhnolohichni karty ta vytraty na vyroshchuvannia silskohospodarskykh kultur [Technological maps and costs for growing crops]. Kyiv: NNTs IAE. [in Ukrainian].  

10.Mazur V. A., Matsera O. O. (2018). Analiz strukturnykh elementiv urozhainosti roslyn ozymoho ripaku zalezhno vid vplyvu udobrennia ta stroku posivu [The analysis of structural elements of winter crop productivity of plants, depending on the influence of fertilization and the time of sowing]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats VNAU.  Silske hospodarstvo ta lisivnytstvo – Collection of scientific works of VNAU.  Agriculture and Forestry. 41-50. [in Ukrainian].  

11.Dospexov B. A. (1985). Metodyka polevogo opыta (s osnovamy statystycheskoj  obrabotky rezultatov yssledovany`j) [The method of field experiment (with the basics of statistical processing of research results] 3-e y`zd., pererab. y` dop. Moskva: Kolos. [in Russian].