Agriculture and forestry

Hetman Nadiia Yakivna –  Doctor of Agricultural Sciences of the Vinnytsia National Agrarian University, Associate Professor at the Department of Plant Production, Crop Breeding and Bioenergy Crops (21008, Vinnytsia, Soniachna St.3,e-mail: nadia.getman52@gmail.com).

Indicators of productivity of a mixture of Lathyrus pannonicus with Triticosecale, as an innovative product in fodder production, have been introduced. Observations have shown that in the interphase period from full sprouting-budding of Lathyrus pannonicus Triticosecale were in the phase of full earing. According to the average daily increase in green mass, a variant was noted in which 75% of Triticosecale (115.2 kg / ha) and 50% of Lathyrus pannonicus (65.2 kg / ha per day) were sown. In Lathyrus pannonicus with different sowing rates, the average daily yield increase decreased to 55.8–59.4 kg / ha against the background of N45P45K45, and for the dose of mineral fertilizers N30P30K30 it was 44.5–49.2 kg / ha. As the dominant crop of the phytocenosis, Triticosecale has the same tendency, where the growth, respectively, reached 107.0–112.8 and 95.7–101.9 kg / ha per day. It was found that option 6 dominated in the yield of green mass, which provided 46.2 and 8.77 t / ha of dry matter with a seeding rate ratio of 75: 50% against the background of mineral fertilizers N45P45K45. The increase in the yield of green mass was by 10.8 and 12.0% of dry matter for option 3 (50: 50%), as well as by 16.7 and 11.0%, respectively, compared to the background N30P30K30. Lathyrus pannonicus provided single-species sowing 17.72-21.35%. The indicators of the chemical composition of Lathyrus pannonicus changed when grown in a mixture with Triticosecale. With the maximum dose of mineral fertilizers and a ratio of seeding rates of 50: 50%, it was 20.15%, or increased by 2.79% than against the background of N30P30K30, or was lower than single-species sowing by 1.20%. Fluctuations in crude protein content between seeding rates and fertilizers were 0.16–1.11 and 2.42–3.29%, respectively. The content of crude fiber in mono-sowing of peas was 26.09–27.72%, and in binary mixtures it increased by 2.20–2.63%. Depending on the studied, the proportion of crude fiber decreased from 3.35 to 26.78%. The total percentage of crude protein in dry matter was caused by the proportion of Lathyrus pannonicus and Triticosecale in the botanical composition. With the application of mineral fertilizers in a dose of N45P45K45, the content of crude protein in var.6 was 14.69%, which is explained by the high percentage   of the   cereal  component in the herbage and the low content of crude protein. By means of exchange experiments, the high digestibility of plant raw materials of a mixture of Triticosecale with Lathyrus pannonicus was determined.

1.Veklenko Yu.A., Didur I.M. (2016). Sumishky` goroshku pannons`kogo  iz try`ty`kale ozy`my`m  – innovaciya dlya stabil`nogo kormovy`robny`cztva [Mixtures of Pannonian peas with winter triticale are an innovation for stable fodder production]. Materialy` mizhnar. nauk. konf. «2016: Zernobobovi kul`tury` ta soya dlya stalogo rozvy`tku agrarnogo vy`robny`cztva Ukrayiny`». Vinny`cya. 11-12 serpnya. 87-89. [in Ukrainian].

2.Zhukov V.P., Ly`xach S.M., Gonchar L.O. (2016). Pozhy`vna cinnist` sy`losu sumishok vy`ky` pannons`koyi z ozy`my`my` zlakovy`my` kul`turamy`[The nutritional value of silage is a mixture of Pannonian vetch with winter cereals]. Materialy` mizhnar. nauk. konf. «2016: Zernobobovi kul`tury` ta soya dlya stalogo rozvy`tku agrarnogo vy`robny`cztva Ukrayiny`». Vinny`cya. 11-12 serpnya, 150-151. [in Ukrainian].

3.Chornolata L. P., Py`ry`n N. I., Novakovs`ka V. Yu. (2019).  Kormova cinnist` sumishky` try`ty`kale i goroshku pannons`kogo [Nutritional value of a mixture of triticale and Pannonian peas]. Kormy` i kormovy`j bilok − Feed and feed protein. Issue 88. 107-112. [in Ukrainian].

4. Dospekhov B.A. (1985). The method of field experiment (with the basics of statistical processing of research results [The method of field experiment (with the basics of statistical processing of research results]. M .: Agropromizdat. [in Russian].

5. Zolotarev VN, Seregin S.V. (2012). Agrobiological and technological foundations of increasing the efficiency of seed production in furry vetch (winter) [Agrobiological and technological foundations of increasing the efficiency of seed production in furry vetch (winter)]. Dosty`zheny`ya nauky` y` texny`ky` APK − Achievements of science and technology of the agro-industrial complex. №. 10. P. 32-34. [in Russian].

6.Metody`ka provedennya doslidzhen` u kormovy`robny`cztvi i godivli tvary`n (1998). [A.O. Baby`ch, M.F. Kuly`k, P.S. Makarenko i in.]; pid red. A.O. Baby`cha.  Ky`yiv.  Agrarna nauka. [in Ukrainian].

7.Lithourgidis A.S., Vasilakoglou I.B., Dhima K.V., Dordas C.A. (2006). Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Research. 99. 106-113. [In English].

8.Guido Haas, Heike Brand and Mirea Puente de la Vega. (2007). Nitrogen from hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) as winter green manure for white cabbage in organic horticulture. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture. Vol. 25, P. 37-53. [In English].

9.Khoshnood Alizadeh, and Jaime A. (2013). Teixeira da Silva. Mixed cropping of annual feed legumes with barley improves feed quantity and crude protein content under dry-land conditions. Maejo Int. J. Sci. Technol. 7 (01). 42-47. [In English].

10.Mothapo N. V.; Grossman J.M.; Sooksa-nguan T.; Maul J. (2013).  Cropping history affects nodulation and symbiotic efficiency of distinct hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth.) genotypes with resident soil rhizobia.  Publications from USDAARS. UNL Faculty. Paper 1312. [In English].

11.New approaches for grassland research in a context of climate and socio-economic changes (2012). Edited by Z. Acar, A. Lopez-Francos, C.Porqueddu. Options mediterraneenes. Series A: Mediterranean Seminars. 102. [In English].

12. Rinnofner T., Friedel J.K., Kruijff R., Pietsch G. (2008). Effect of catch crops on N dynamics and following crops in organic farming. Agron. Sustain. Dev.  28. 551-558. [In English].