Сільське господарство та лісівництво

Kolisnik Oleg Nikolaevich – Сandidate of agricultural sciences Sciences, associate Professor of the Department of Botany, Genetics and Plant Protection of the Vinnitsa National Agrarian University (21008, Vinnytsia, Soniachna Str. 3, e-mail: ooov@i.ua).

The stability of hybrids to the bile duct depends on the number of resistant to this disease of parental forms. The study of the degree of inheritance of resistance to flying sauce by determining the correlation dependence of stability between hybrids and their parental forms showed that the highest correlation relationship was established between hybrids and the average of both parent forms (r = 0.711; 0.671), as well as between hybrids and maternal forms ( g = 0.552; 0.527). The obtained results indicate the close dependence of hybrids on both parent forms, as well as on the superiority of maternal inheritance. To obtain hybrids of corn resistant to flying canoes, it is necessary to select high-yielding and resistant to pests and diseases both parental forms, as indicated by the correlation between the simple hybrids and the average value of the parent forms (r = 0,508 ... 0,926), according to the relevant features.

1. Andriyenko A., Dergachov D, Kuzmych V. (2015). Adevej zavzhdy v avangardi [Advey is always at the forefront]. Zerno.– Grain. 3 (108). 108-112. [in Ukrainian]. 

2. Baxmut O. O. (2001). Kukurudzyanyj metelyk. Stijkist novyx gibrydiv i sortiv kultury shhodo jogo poshkodzhen [Corn Butterfly. Sustainability of new hybrids and cultivars in relation to its damage]. Zaxyst roslyn – Plant protection. 9. 14-15. [in Ukrainian]. 

3. Vavylov N. Y. (1964). Yzbrannыe trudы: V 5 t. Problemы ymmunyteta kulturnыx rastenyj [Selected works. Problems of immunity of cultivated plants]. Moskva: Vols. 4. [in Russian]. 

4. Guryeva I. A., Ryabchun V. K., Kuzmyshyna N. V. (2005). Genetychne riznomanittya zrazkiv kukurudzy Nacionalnogo centru genetychnyx resursiv roslyn Ukrayiny [Genetic diversity of samples of maize of the National Center for Plant Genetic Resources of Ukraine]. Xarkiv, [in Ukrainian]. 

5. Yvashhenko V. G. (2011). Puzыrchataya golovnya kukuruzы: эtyologyya, patogenez bolezny y problema ustojchyvosty (utochnenye paradygmы). [Bubbly maize smut: etiology, pathogenesis of the disease and the problem of sustainability (clarification of the paradigm)]. Vestnyk zashhytы rastenyj – Plant Protection Bulletin. 4, 40-56. [in Russian]. 

6. Kolisnyk O. M. (2015). Stijkist samozapylenyx linij kukurudzy do ustilagozeae. Organichne vyrobnycztvo i prodovolcha bezpeka (drukovani teza) [Steam self-zaplani lіnіy kukurudzi to ustilagozeae. Organized virobnitstvo and food security (Drukovna teza)]. Zhytomyr: Vyd-vo «Polissya» (pp. 437-442) [in Ukrainian]. 

7. Ryumyna N. A. (1972). Ocenka ustojchyvosty samoopыlennыx lynyj kukuruzы k puzыrchatoj golovne [Evaluation of the sustainability of self-pollinated corn lines to buccal smut]. Trudы po prykladnoj botanyke, genetyke y selekcyy – Works on applied botany, genetics and selection. Issue. 46. 91-97. [in Russian]. 

8. Czagan-Mandzhyev N. L., Sotchenko V. S. (1989) Kombynacyonnaya sposobnost lynyj kukuruzы y uslovyya sredы [Combination ability of corn lines and environmental conditions]. Byul. VYR – Bul. VIR. Issue. 189. 10-12. [in Russian]. 

9. Klymchuk O. V. (2012). Xarakterystyka vyxidnogo materialu pry stvorenni prostyx gibrydiv kukurudzy dlya umov monokultury [Characteristics of the source material when creating simple hybrids of maize for monoculture conditions]. Kormy i kormovyrobnycztvo – Feed and feed production. Issue. 72. 17-23. [in Ukrainian].