Agriculture and forestry

Haidai Liubov Sergiivna – Assistant of the Agriculture, Soil Science and Agrochemistry Department of Vinnitsa National Agrarian University (21008, Vinnitsa, Soniachna Str., 3, e-mail: liubasha91@gmail.com).

The results of three-year studies of the effect of presowing seed treatment on field germination and plant survival of common bean plants in the conditions of the Right-Bank    Forest-Steppe  of  Ukraine  are  presented.   The  study  determined  the patterns of the effect of presowing seed treatment on the change in these indicators in 2014-2016. It was established that the field germination of seeds and the survival rate of the studied varieties of common beans depending on the presowing treatment with different nitrogen-fixing strains of Rhizobium phaseoli microorganisms together with the biological preparations Regoplant and EPAA were slightly different. To a certain extent, the variability of indicators of field germination and survival of common bean plants was influenced by weather conditions. The best conditions for obtaining friendly shoots of common bean are the highest field germination established in the variant Rhizobium phaseoli (F-16) + Regoplant + EPAA and amounted to 95,2% for the Galactica variety, 97,3% for the Slavia variety, respectively. The lowest rates were observed in the variant without seed treatment, in the Galactica variety – 89,4%, and in the Slavia variety – 91,5%. The survival of common bean plants also depended on the presowing treatment of seeds and was high in the Galactica variety in the Rhizobium phaseoli (657a) variants – 90,5%, and Rhizobium phaseoli (657a) + Regoplant + EPAA – 90,2%. In the Slavia variety, in the variant with presowing seed treatment of Rhizobium phaseoli (F-16) + Regoplant + EPAA – 83,1%. The results of analysis of variance of the data obtained confirm that, to the greatest extent, field germination, over the years of research, was influenced by presowing treatment of seeds (B) - 70% and variety (A) - 25%. The interaction of factors (AB) - 1% and other factors - 4%, practically did not affect the change in field germination.

1. Ovcharuk O. V. (2013). Kharakterystyka sortiv kvasoli zvychaynoyi v umovakh Lisostepu Zakhidnoho [Characteristics of bean varieties common in the forest-steppe of the West]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu bioenerhetychnykh kulʹtur i tsukrovykh buryakiv – Collection of scientific works of the Institute of Bioenergetic Cultures and Sugar Beet. Issue 17. (Vols I). 236-239. [in Ukrainian].

2. Polyans'ka L. N. Zaginaylo N.I. (1991). Novyye sorta fasoli [New varieties of beans]. Selektsiya i semenovodstvo – Selection and seed production. 3. 39-40. [in Russian]. 

3. Holokhorynsʹka M. H., Ovcharuk O. V., Velychko S. Y., Vykhrystyuk M. A. (2005). Stvorennya novykh sortiv kvasoli ta yikh vprovadzhennya u vyrobnytstvo [Creation of new varieties of beans and their introduction into production]. Mizhvid. temat. nauk. zb. Instytutu roslynnytstva im. V. YA. Yur’yeva UAAN – Intersection thematic sciences save Institute of Plant Cultivation to them. V. Ya. Yuriev UAAS. 90. 149-152. [in Ukrainian].

4. Rozhkov O. A., Trush O. K. (2018). Polʹova skhozhistʹ nasinnya ta zberezhenistʹ roslyn kvasoli zalezhno vid normy vysivu nasinnya [Field similarity of seed and preservation of beans plants depending on the norm of seeding]. Visnyk Poltavsʹkoyi derzhavnoyi ahrarnoyi akademiyi. Silske hospodarstvo. Roslynnytstvo – Bulletin of Poltava State Agrarian Academy. Agriculture. Plant growing. 4. 30-36. Doi:10.31210/visnyk2018.04.04.[in Ukrainian].

5. Mazur O. V., Poroxovnyk I. I. (2016). Selekciya kvasoli zvychajnoyi na rannostyglist i zernovu produktyvnist [Selection of common beans for early maturity and grain yield]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Silske hospodarstvo ta lisivnytstvo – Collection of scientific works. Agriculture and Forestry. 4. 118-124. [in Ukrainian].

6. Babych A. O., Petrychenko V. F. (1995). Osoblyvosti provedennya doslidzhenʹ pry vyvchenni konkurentnykh vzayemovidnosyn v ahrobiotsenozakh soyi [Features of conducting research in the study of competitive relationships in soybean agrobiocenoses]. Kormy i kormovyrobnytstvo – Forage and feed production. Issue 40. 35-41. [in Ukrainian].

7. Kaminsʹkyy V. (2006). Ahrometeorolohichni osnovy vyrobnytstva zernobobovykh kulʹtur v Ukrayini [Agrometeorological bases of legumes production in Ukraine]. Visnyk ahrarnoyi nauky – Bulletin of Agrarian Science. 7. 20-25. [in Ukrainian].

8. Tkalich I. D. (2007). Vplyv sposobiv sivby i norm vysivu na rist, rozvytok i urozhaynistʹ soyi [Influence of sowing methods and seed rates on growth, development and yield of soybeans]. Byuletenʹ Instytutu zernovoho hospodarstva – Bulletin of the Institute of Grain Farming. Issue 30. 60-63. Doi:10.31210 /visnyk2013.01.02. [in Ukrainian].

9. Mostipan M. I. (2015). Roslynnytstvo. Laboratornyy praktykum [Plant Growing. Laboratory Workshop]. Kirovograd. [in Ukrainian].

10. Mazur V. A., Haidai L. S. (2018). Ekonomichna efektyvnistʹ tekhnolohiyi vyroshchuvannya kvasoli [Economic efficiency of bean cultivation technology]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Silske hospodarstvo ta lisivnytstvo – Collection of scientific works. Agriculture and Forestry. 9. 17-29. [in Ukrainian].

11. Haidai L. S. (2019). Vplyv inokulyatsiyi na khimichnyy sklad nasinnya kvasoli zvychaynoyi. [Effect of inoculation on the chemical composition of ordinary bean seeds]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Silske hospodarstvo ta lisivnytstvo – Collection of scientific works. Agriculture and Forestry. 12. 44-52. [in Ukrainian].