Agriculture and forestry

Mialkovskyi Ruslan Oleksandrovich − Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor of the Department of Horticulture, Geodesy and Land Management of the Higher Education Institution of the Podil State University (32300, Kamianets-Podilskyi, Shevchenka St., 13 ruslanmialkovskui@.ua).

Mazur Oleksandr Vasyliovych – Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Plant Production, Selection and Bioenergetic Cultures, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University (21008, Vinnytsia, Soniachna Str., 3 е-mail: selection@vsau.vin.ua).

Stashevsky R.V. – Postgraduate student of the Department of Plant Breeding, Breeding and Bioenergy Crops of Vinnytsia National Agrarian University (21008, Vinnytsia, Soniachna Str. 3).

A comparative evaluation of the selection material was carried out and the best variety samples of common beans were selected, both in terms of the level of manifestation of signs, and their sustainable implementation under a contrasting hydrothermal growing regime during the period of research. The differences between the variety samples were established by means of a comparative assessment of the manifestation of signs compared to the standard. According to the height of attachment of the lower beans, the following cultivars stood out: UD0302930 - 16.4 cm, coefficient of variation (V, %) - 2.6%, coefficient of agronomic stability (As) - 97.4%, homeostaticity (Hom) - 6.3; UD0302957 – 16.1 cm, coefficient of variation (V, %) – 3.5%, coefficient of agronomic stability (As) – 96.5%, homeostaticity (Hom) – 4.6. The highest number of seeds per plant was noted in variety UD0301736 - 42.4 pcs., the coefficient of variation (V, %) - 6.2%, the coefficient of agronomic stability (As) - 93.8%, and the highest homeostaticity (Hom) among the presented varieties - 6.9. The highest mass of 1000 grains was noted in the sample UD0300227 – 230.1 g, however, this form has higher variability indicators compared to the standard. Coefficient of variation (V,%) – 11.2%, coefficient of agronomic stability (As) – 88.8%, homeostaticity (Hom) – 20.6; UD0303753 – 187.1 g, coefficient of variation (V, %) – 8.1%, coefficient of agronomic stability (As) – 91.9% and the highest homeostatic index (Hom) in our studies – 23.2. Compared to the standard, the best yield samples were: UD0300227 – 349 g, UD0301736 – 359 g, UD0300411 – 339 g, UD0301043 – 333 g, Local 1 – 333 g.The highest resistance to damage by virus and yellow virus mosaic was noted in varieties: UD0301736 – 83.0 and 79.9%, UD0300227 – 81.2 and 78.9%, UD0300411 – 77.0 and 78.1%. The following cultivars stood out for their resistance to bacterial blight and bacterial wilt: UD0301736 – 92.4 and 89.4%, UD0300227 – 92.3 and 88.5%, UD0300411 – 89.9 and 85.9%; Local 1 – 88.6 and 83.4%.

1.Chy`nchy`k O.S., Olifirovy`ch S.J., Olifirovy`ch V.O. (2021). Try`valist` vegetaciyi ta produkty`vnist` sortiv kvasoli zvy`chajnoyi v umovax Pivdennoyi chasty`ny` Lisostepu zaxidnogo [Vegetation duration and productivity of common bean varieties in the conditions of the Southern part of the Western Forest Steppe]. Agrobiologiya –Agrobiology. № 1. 166-172. [in Ukrainian].

2.Doktor N.M. (2018). Efekty`vnist` sy`mbioty`chnoyi diyal`nosti rosly`n kvasoli zvy`chajnoyi za vnesennya mineral`ny`x dobry`v ta inokulyaciyi nasinnya [Effectiveness of symbiotic activity of common bean plants with mineral fertilizers and seed inoculation]. «Naukovi gory`zonty`»− «Scientific horizons». № 7–8 (70). 59-63. [in Ukrainian].

3.Poyedy`nceva A.A. (2019). Osnovni xvoroby` kvasoli v ukrayini. shkidly`vist` i zaxody` zaxy`stu [The main diseases of beans in Ukraine. harmfulness and protective measures]. Visny`k Xarkivs`kogo nacional`nogo agrarnogo universy`tetu. Seriya «Fitopatologiya ta entomologiya» − Bulletin of Kharkiv National Agrarian University. Phytopathology and Entomology Series. № 1−2. 127-133. [in Ukrainian].

4.Mazur V.A., Didur I.M., Tkachuk O.P., Pancy`reva G.V. (2021). Agroekologichna stijkist` sortiv kvasoli zvy`chajnoyi do nespry` yatly` vy`xumov vegetaciyi [Agroecological resistance of common bean varieties to adverse growing conditions]. Naukovi dopovidi NUBiP Ukrayiny − Scientific reports of NUBiP of Ukraine. № 2 (90). 21-32. [in Ukrainian].

5.Mazur O.V., Poroxovny`k I.I. (2016). Selekciya kvasoli zvy`chajnoyi na rann`osty`glist` i zernovu produkty`vnist` [Selection of common beans for early maturity and grain productivity]. Sil`s`ke gospodarstvo ta lisivny`cztvo − Agriculture and forestry. № 4. 118–124. [in Ukrainian].

6.Ushkarenko V.O., Lavrenko S.O., Maksy`mov D.O. (2018). Matematy`chne modelyuvannya vrozhayu zerna kvasoli zvy`chajnoyi (Phaseolus vulgaris l.) zalezhno vid texnologichny`x pry`jomiv yiyi vy`roshhuvannya [Mathematical modeling of the grain yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) depending on the technological methods of its cultivation]. Tavrijs`ky`j nauk. visny`k − Tavriyskyi nauk. herald. Issue. 99. 148–152. [in Ukrainian].

7.Olifirovy`ch S.J. (2015). Vy`vchennya sortozrazkiv kvasoli zvy`chajnoyi na pry`datnist` do mexanizovanogo zby`rannya v umovax pivdennoyi chasty`ny` Lisostepu Zaxidnogo [Study of varieties of common bean for suitability for mechanized harvesting in the conditions of the southern part of the Western Forest Steppe]. Zbirny`k naukovy`x pracz` Selekcijno-genety`chnogo insty`tutu – Nacional`nogo centru nasinnyeznavstva ta sortovy`vchennya − Coll. of science Proceedings of the Selection and Genetics Institute - Nat. center of seed science and variety study. Issue. 26 (66). 148–153. [in Ukrainian].

8.Koby`zyeva L.N., Bezugla O.M., Terty`shny`j O.V. (2012). Potencial zernobobovy`x kul`tur dlya stvorennya sortiv, pry`datny`x do mexanizovanogo zby`rannya urozhayu [The potential of leguminous crops to create varieties suitable for mechanized harvesting]. Selekciya i nasinny`cztvo − Breeding and seed production. Issue 102. 10–15. [in Ukrainian].

9.Ivanyuk S.V., Glyavy`n A.V. (2012). Ocinka sortozrazkiv kvasoli zvy`chajnoyi na osnovi korelyaciyi kil`kisny`x oznak ta indeksiv [Assessment of variety samples of common beans based on the correlation of quantitative traits and indices]. Selekciya i nasinny`cztvo − Breeding and seed production. Issue. 101. 192–197. [in Ukrainian].

10.Bezugla O.M. (2017). Dzherela kvasoli zvy`chajnoyi (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) za pry`datnistyu do mexanizovanogo zby`rannya [Sources of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) according to suitability for mechanized harvesting]. Genety`chni resursy` rosly`n − Genetic resources of plants. № 21. 41–52. [in Ukrainian].

11.Olifirovy`ch S.J., Olifirovy`ch V.O. (2020). Urozhajnist` vitchy`znyany`x sortiv kvasoli zvy`chajnoyi (zernovoyi) v umovax Pivdennoyi chasty`ny` Lisostepu Zaxidnogo [Productivity of domestic varieties of common (grain) beans in the conditions of the Southern part of the Western Forest-Steppe]. Peredgirne ta girs`ke zemlerobstvo i tvary`nny`cztvo − Foothill and mountain agriculture and animal husbandry. Issue. 68 (I). 162-175. [in Ukrainian].

12.Bezugla O.M., Koby`zyeva L.N. (2015). Genety`chni resursy` rosly`n u vy`rishenni problem selekciyi kvasoli v Ukrayini [Genetic resources of plants in solving problems of bean breeding in Ukraine]. Zbirny`k naukovy`x pracz` Selekcijno-genety`chnogo insty`tutu −Coll. of science Proceedings of the Selection and Genetics Institute. Issue 26. 74–83. [in Ukrainian]

13.Bezugla O.M., Koby`zyeva L.N., Ryabchun V.K., Drepin I.M. (2004). Shy`roky`j unifikovany`j klasy`fikator Ukrayiny` rodu Phaseolus L. [Wide unified classifier of Ukraine of the genus Phaseolus L.] Xarkiv. [in Ukrainian].

14.Ovcharuk O.V., Kalens`ka S.M., Ovcharuk V.I., Tkach O.V. (2021). Xaraktery`sty`ka struktury` produkty`vnosti, urozhajnosti ta yakisnogo skladu zerna sortiv kvasoli zvy`chajnoyi (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) [Characterization of the structure of productivity, productivity and qualitative composition of the grain of varieties of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)]. Agrobiologiya – Agrobiology. № 2. 106-115. [in Ukrainian].

15.Sichkar V.I., Lavrova G.D., Ganzhelo O.I. (2014). Urozhajnist` i yakist` nasinnya shy`rokoadaptovany`x sortiv soyi [Yield and seed quality of widely adapted soybean varieties]: Zbirny`k naukovy`x pracz` Selekcijno-genety`chnogo insty`tutu −Coll. of science Proceedings of the Selection and Genetics Institute. Issue. 23. 72–87. [in Ukrainian].

16.Ivanyuk C.B., Shkatula Yu.M. (2013). Fitopatologichna ocinka sortozrazkiv soyi v umovax Pravoberezhnogo Lisostepu Ukrayiny [Phytopathological evaluation of soybean varieties in the conditions of the Right Bank Forest Steppe of Ukraine]`. Selekciya i nasinny`cztvo −Breeding and seed production. Issue. 103. 255-260. [in Ukrainian].

17.URL: https://meteopost.com/weather/archive/. [in Ukrainian].