Agriculture and forestry

Verhelis Victoria – Assistant Professor of the Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University (21008, Vinnytsia, 3, Solnychna St., e-mail: viktoriya_iv47@ukr.net).

On poorly washed chernozems podzolized with hard loam, the humus content decreases by 12.9%, compared with unwashed soils. Low-washed chernozems podzolic had a content of easily hydrolyzed nitrogen by 13.3% less than unwashed. The content of mobile forms of phosphorus on slightly washed soils decreased by 51.1%. The content of mobile potassium on unwashed chernozem podzolic heavy loam was 34.9% higher than on weakly washed soil. Observations of chernozem podzolic heavy loam medium washed showed that the humus content decreased by 8.8% compared to slightly washed. The content of easily hydrolyzed nitrogen decreased by 14.3%. The content of mobile forms of phosphorus increased by 15.3%. The content of mobile forms of potassium increased by 42.9%. Hydrolytic acidity of slightly washed soil increased by 4.9%. The reaction of the soil solution - by 1.8%. The amount of absorbed bases increased by 11.4%. Medium-washed chernozem podzolic heavy loam had hydrolytic acidity 11.3% higher than slightly washed. The reaction of the soil solution was 1.7% lower. The amount of absorbed bases was the same. Changes in the agrochemical composition of podzolic heavy loam chernozem on unwashed and lightly washed soils showed that weak soil erosion leads to a decrease in humus, easily hydrolyzed nitrogen, mobile forms of phosphorus and potassium, increasing the value of hydrolytic acidity, and the amount of solute. The largest decrease in the content of mobile forms of phosphorus - by 51.1% and the smallest and almost identical decrease in the content of humus and easily hydrolyzed nitrogen - by 12.9-13.3%. The sum of absorbed bases increased the most among the indicators of acidity of chernozem podzolized heavy-washed slightly washed, in comparison with the unwashed one, by 11.4%, and the reaction of soil pH solution increased the least - by 1.8%. From the agroecological point of view, weak soil erosion causes deterioration of such soil fertility indicators as reduction of humus content, easily hydrolyzed nitrogen, mobile forms of phosphorus and potassium, increase of soil hydrolytic acidity. At the same time, the reaction rates of the soil salt solution in the neutral direction improve and the amount of absorbed bases increases. A similar dependence is observed when comparing the agrochemical parameters of weakly and medium-washed chernozem podzolic hard loam. In particular, a decrease in the content of humus, easily hydrolyzed nitrogen, a decrease in the magnitude of the reaction of the soil pH solution and an increase in hydrolytic acidity, which are negative factors. The largest negative manifestation was observed on the decrease in the value of hydrolytic acidity of the medium-washed soil - by 14.3%, and the least - on the value of the reaction of the soil pH solution - by 1.7%. At the same time, the increase in the degree of soil erosion from slightly washed to medium washed led to an increase in the medium washed chernozem podzolic heavy loam content of mobile forms of phosphorus and especially potassium, the content of which increased by 42.9%. Comparison of the change in the agrochemical condition of chernozem podzolic heavy loam slightly washed with medium washed showed that the humus content decreases more intensively in slightly washed soil, compared with the average washed, by 4.1%; the content of easily hydrolyzed nitrogen decreased more intensively in medium-washed soil, compared with slightly washed, by 1%. Hydrolytic acidity has increased by 6.4% more intensively on moderately washed soils compared to poorly washed soils.

1.Chyr N. (2014). Ekoloho-ahrokhimichnyi stan hruntiv baseinu r. Vyzhivka u suchasnykh umovakh hospodariuvannia [Ecological and agrochemical condition of soils of the Vyzhivka river basin in modern economic conditions]. Ekolohiia ta okhorona navkolyshnoho seredovyshcha. Aktualni pytannia humanitarnykh nauk. –Ecology and environmental protection. Current issues of the humanities. Issue. 8. 413-419. [in Ukrainian].

2.Tkachuk O.P., Zaitseva T.M. (2017). Pokaznyky ahroekolohichnoi stiikosti hruntiv ta faktory, shcho na nykh vplyvaiut [Indicators of agroecological stability of soils and factors influencing them]. Silske hospodarstvo ta lisivnytstvo − Agriculture and forestry. № 5. 137-145. [in Ukrainian].

3.Baliuk S.A., Medvediev V.V., Tarariko O.H. (2010). Natsionalna dopovid pro stan rodiuchosti gruntiv Ukrainy [National report on the state of soil fertility in Ukraine]. ta in. K.: TOV «VYK PRYNT». [in Ukrainian].

4.Ivancha A., Rybarak A., Maliuk T.V. (2019). Zakonomirnosti zmin pokaznykiv humusovoho stanu gruntiv u sadivnytstvi pivdnia Ukrainy. [Regularities of changes in indicators of humus condition of soils in horticulture in the south of Ukraine.] Innovatsiini ahrotekhnolohii: materialy VI Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. Inter.-konf., m. Melitopol: TDATU. Issue VI. 9–12. [in Ukrainian].

5.Tkachuk O.P., Zaitseva T.M., Dubovyi Yu.V. (2017). Vplyv silskohospodarskykh toksykantiv na ahroekolohichnyi stan hruntu. [Influence of agricultural toxicants on agroecological condition of soil]. Silske hospodarstvo ta lisivnytstvo − Agriculture and forestry. № 6. Vols. 2. 102-109. [in Ukrainian].

6.Bakka M. T., Strelchenko V. P. (2000). Osnovy vedennia silskoho hospodarstva ta okhorona zemel [Fundamentals of agriculture and land protection]. Zhytomyr. [in Ukrainian].

7.Voloshchuk M.D. (2016). Eroziina dehradatsiia chornozemiv pivdenno-zakhidnoi chastyny Ukrainy i respubliky Moldova. [Erosion degradation of chernozems of the south-western part of Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova]. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho derzhavnoho ahrarno-ekonomichnoho universytetu. Seriia «Silskohospodarska ekolohiia. Ahronomichni nauky − Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk State Agrarian and Economic University. Series "Agricultural Ecology. Agronomic sciences" № 4 (42). 41–51. [in Ukrainian].

8.Iablokov A.V. (1988). O nedootsenke otrytsatelnыkh posledstvyi prymenenyia pestytsydov y o vazhnosty razrabotky ynыkh putei razvytyia selskoho khoziaistva. [On underestimating the negative effects of the use of pesticides and the importance of developing other ways of developing agriculture.]. Pushchyno. [in Russian].

9.Hrabak N.Kh., Topikha I.N., Davydenko V.M., Shevel I.V. (2006). Osnovy vedennia silskoho hospodarstva ta okhorona zemel. [Fundamentals of agriculture and land protection]. [in Ukrainian].

10.Materialy monitorynhu ta ekoloho-ahrokhimichnoi pasportyzatsii silskohospodarskykh uhid FH «Avhust V.A.» (2017). s. Markivka Tomashpilskoho raionu Vinnytskoi oblasti. [Materials of monitoring and ecological-agrochemical certification of agricultural lands of FG "August VA" with. Markivka, Tomashpil district, Vinnytsia region.]. Vinnytska filiia derzhavnoi ustanovy «Instytut okhorony hruntiv Ukrainy». Ahronomichne. [in Ukrainian].

11.DSTU 7828:2015 Yakist gruntu. (2015). Vyznachennia hrupovoho ta fraktsiinoho skladu humusu za metodom Tiurina u modyfikatsii Ponomarovoi ta Plotnykovoi. [Soil quality. Determination of group and fractional composition of humus by the method of Tyurin in the modification of Ponomareva and Plotnikova]. [Chynnyi vid 2016-07-01]. Kyiv. (Informatsiia ta dokumentatsiia). [in Ukrainian].

12.DSTU ISO 10390-2007. Yakist gruntu. (2012). Vyznachennia rN. [Soil quality. Determination of pH]. [Chynnyi vid 2009-10-01]. Kyiv. (Informatsiia ta dokumentatsiia). [in Ukrainian].

13.DSTU 4115-2002 Grunty. (2002). Vyznachannia rukhomykh spoluk fosforu i kaliiu za modyfikovanym metodom Chyrykova. [Soils. Determination of mobile compounds of phosphorus and potassium by the modified Chirikov method]. [Chynnyi vid 2003-01-01]. Kyiv. (Informatsiia ta dokumentatsiia). [in Ukrainian].

14.DSTU 7863:2015 Yakist gruntu. (2015). Vyznachennia lehkohidroliznoho azotu metodom Kornfilda. [Soil quality. Determination of light hydrolysis nitrogen by the Cornfield method]. [Chynnyi vid 2016-07-01]. Kyiv. (Informatsiia ta dokumentatsiia). [in Ukrainian].