Agriculture and forestry

Branitskyi Yurii Yuriyovych – Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Director of the Uladovo-Lyulinetsky Experimental Breeding Station of the Institute of Bioenergetic Cultures and Sugar Beet NAAS (Vinnytia region, Kalynivka, district, Uladivske, Samolevska Str., 15).

Mazur Oleksandr Vasyliovych – Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Crop Production and Horticulture, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University (21008, Vinnytsia, Soniachna Str., 3 е-mail: selection@vsau.vin.ua).

The article differentiation of varieties of beans of conventional yields in different hydrothermal years by a number of indexes, which characterize the stability of samples to drought, and also identified the different and low levels of genotypes with high and low levels of drought resistance. The main advantages of the drought resistance assessment method for the use of indices include the availability of the necessary data, the ability to study a considerable amount of varieties of varieties, the simplicity of calculations and the determination in units of the most important agronomic characteristics - yields. The best tolerance indexes (tol) were the varieties of beans common local white - 0.31, local green - 0.37, libra - 0.38, Cossacks - 0.48 t/ha. As a result of experimental studies, a number of best varieties of common beans with high levels of drought resistant are highlighted: local green and libra by indexes - YS, YP, MP, MP, Tol, Yrr, SSI, SSPI, YSI, DI, RDI, ISR; Gigantella and marble - ys, yp, mp, yi, gmp, hmp, sti, di, RDI, with high yield formation, both under favorable and adverse conditions;The use in the breeding practice of the selected best varieties of common beans with the help of breeding indexes will allow the starting material for synthetic breeding when creating new yields and drought resistant varieties. In addition, for breeding practice, we recommend using the indexes we have studied to identify the breeding material for drought resistance and yield for growing it in different hydrothermal conditions. The use of selected breeding material will serve as the formation of soybean working collection by resistance to drought and increased yield under favorable and adverse hydrothermal growing conditions.

1.Iermolenko N.S., Khokhlov V.M. (2012). Porivniannia prostorovo-chasovykhkharakterystyk posukh v Ukraini na pochatku ta naprykintsi 20 storichchia [Comparison of spatial-temporal characteristics of droughts in Ukraine at the beginning and at the end of the twentieth century]. Ukrainskyi hidrometeorolohichnyi zhurnal − Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Journal. №10. 65–72.[in Ukrainian].

2.Chеrnobaі L.N., Ponurenko S.G., Sikalova O.V. (2016). Evaluation ofstability for maize genotype characteristics by drought tolerance indices under different hydrothermal conditions. Wschodnioeuropejskie Czasopismo Naukowe (East European Scientific Journal). Vol. 8. № 6. P. 69–75. [in English].

3.Beltrano J., Marta G.R. (2008). Improved tolerance of wheat plants(Triticum aestivum L.) to drought stress and rewatering by the arbuscularmycorrhizal fungus Glomusclaroideum: Effect on growth and cell membrane stability. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology. Vol. 20. № 1. Р. 29–37. [in English].

4.Ribaut J.M., Poland D. (1999). Molecular approaches for the geneticimprovement of cereals for stable production in water-limited environments. A Strategic Planning Workshop held at CIMMYT. 180 p. [in English].

5.Vasylkivskyi S.P., Hudzenko V.M., Kochmarskyi V.S., Kyrylenko V.V.(2017). Realizatsiia potentsialu sortiv zernovykh kultur – shliakh vyrishennia prodovolchoi problemy [The realization of the potential of grain varieties is a way to solve the food problem]. Faktory eksperymentalnoi evoliutsii orhanizmiv − Factors of experimental evolution of organisms. Vol. 21. 47–51. [in Ukrainian].

6.Talebi R., Fayaz F., Naji A.M. (2009). Effective selection criteria forassessing drought stress tolerance in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). General and Applied Plant Physiology. Vol. 35. № ½. Р. 64–74. [in English].

7.Mehraban A., Tobe A., Gholipouri A., Amiri E., Ghafari A., Rostaii M.(2018). Evaluation of drought tolerance indices and yield stability of wheat cultivars to drought stress in different growth stage. World Journal of Environmental Biosciences. Vol. 7. Issue 1. P. 8–14. [in English].

8.Fernandez G.C.J. (1992). Effective selection criteria for assessing plantstress tolerance. Proceeding of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress. Aug. 13–16, Shanhua, Taiwan, Р. 257–270. [in English].

9.Rosielle A.A., Hamblin J. (1981). Theoretical aspects of selection for yieldin stress and non-stress environments. Crop Science. Vol. 21. № 6. Р. 943–946. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060033x. [in English].

10.Golestani-Araghi S., Assad M.T. (1998). Evaluation of four screeningtechniques for drought resistance and their relationship to yield reduction ratio in wheat. Euphytica. Vol. 103. № 3. Р. 293–299. [in English].

11.Fisher R. A., Maurer R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars.1.Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. Vol. 29. № 5.Р. 897–912. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AR9780897. [in English].

12.Moosavi S.S., Yazdi Samadi B., Naghavi M.R, Zali A.A, Dashti H.,Pourshahbazi A. (2008). Introduction of new indices to identify relative drought tolerance and resistance in wheat genotypes. Desert (Biaban). Vol. 12. № 2. Р. 165–178. [in English].

13. Bouslama M., Schapaugh W.T. (1984). Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1: evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science. Vol. 24. № 5. C. 933–937. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci 1984.0011183X002400050026x. [in English].

14. Gavuzzi P., Rizza F., Palumbo M., Campanile R. G., Ricciardi G. L., Borgh B. (1997). Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Canadian Journals of Plant Science. Vol. 77. № 4. Р. 523–531. DOI:10.4141/P96-130. [in English].

15. Kristin A.S., Serna R.R., Perez F.I., Enriquez B.C., Gallegos J.A.A., Vallego P.R., Wassimi N., Kelly J.D. (1997). Improving common Bean performance under drought stress. Crop Science. Vol. 37. № 1. P. 43–50. DOI:10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700010007x. [in English].

16. Lan J. (1998). Comparison of evaluating methods for agronomic drought resistance in crops. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica. Vol. 7. P. 85–87. [in English].

17. Tyshchenko A.V., Tyshchenko O.D., Liuta Yu.O. (2021). Otsinka henotypiv liutserny za nasinnievoiu produktyvnistiu na posukhostiikist [Assessment of alfalfa genotypes by seed productivity for drought resistance]. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk. Ceriia: Silskohospodarski nauk − Tavriysk Scientific Bulletin. CERIA: Agricultural Sciences. № 120. 157-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32851/2226-0099.2021.120.21. [in Ukrainian].

18. Moghaddam A., Hadizadeh M.H. (2002). Response of corn (Zea mays L.). Hybrids and their parental lines to drought using different stress tolerance indices. J. Seed and plant improvement. Vol. 18, Issue 3. P. 255–275. DOI: 10.22092/SPIJ.2017.110741. [in English].

19. Pykalo S.V., Demydov O.A., Yurchenko T.V., Khomenko S.O., Humeniuk O.V., Kharchenko M.V. (2020). Indeksnyi pidkhid dlia doboru posukhostiikykh sortiv pshenytsi v umovakh nestiikoho klimatu [Index approach for the selection of drought -resistant wheat varieties in unstable climates]. Ekolohichni nauky − Environmental Sciences № 2 (29). Vol. 2. 157-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32846/2306- 9716/2020.eco.2-29.2.24. [in Ukrainian].

20. Saba J., Moghaddam M., Ghassemi K. and Nishabouri M.R. (2001). Genetic properties of drought resistance indices. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2001. Vol. 3. P. 43–49. [in English].