Agriculture and forestry

Tsytsiura Yaroslav Grigoryevich – Candidate of Agricultural Sciences (PhD), Associate Professor of the Department of Soil Management, Soil Science and Agrochemistry, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University. (Address: 21008, Vinnytsia, Sonyachna st., 3, e-mail: yaroslavtsytsyura@ukr.net).

The article highlights the results of studying critical periods in the phenological development of oilseed radish varieties based on the use of basic indicators of the chlorophyll fluorescence induction curve (initial fluorescence (F0), plateau zone fluorescence (Fpl), maximum fluorescence (Fm), and stationary fluorescence (Fst). This complex was applied to oilseed radish plants of three varieties – ‘Rayduga’, ‘Zhuravka’ and ‘Lybid’ with the presentation of results for the variety ‘Zhuravka’ due to the similarity of the obtained data. phases of growth and development of oilseed radish: cotyledon phase, budding phase, flowering phase, green pod phase and yellow-green pod phase. Based on the use of a single-beam porous fluorimeter ‘Floratest’, developed by the Research and Engineering Center of Microelectronics of the Institute of Cybernetics named after V.M. Glushkova (Ukraine) formed curves of chlorophyll fluorescence induction (CFI) in the mode of 90-second fixation of parameters for each phenological phase of oilseed radish plants.The system of graphical display of regularity of formation of basic indicators of CFI curve within the main phenological phases is analyzed and generalizations and conclusions concerning dynamics of course of photochemical physiological processes of photosystem II of plants are made. in the process of phenological stage changes and the corresponding processes of morphogenesis of oilseed radish plants. The dynamics of exogenous and endogenous factors on the formation of indicators of assimilative activity of oilseed radish plant photosystems is analyzed on the basis of analysis of position and changes in time of main points of CFI schedule and substantiated obtained indicators with predicted physiological state of plants and possible assimilation activity. The values of baseline and indication indicators of CFI curve are compared to the main phenological phase of flowering, which is defined as the baseline in ensuring the realization of the productive potential of oilseed radish plants.

1.Mazur V.A., Didur I.M., Pantsyreva H.V. (2020). Obgruntuvannia adaptyvnoisortovoi tekhnolohii vyroshchuvannia zernobobovykh kultur u Pravoberezhnomu Lisostepu Ukrainy [Substantiation of adaptive varietal technology of growing legumes in the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine]. Silske hospodarstvo ta lisivnytstvo – Agriculture and forestry. № 18. S. 5–16. [in Ukrainian].

2.Mazur O.V. (2019). Otsinka sortozrazkiv soi za kompleksom tsinnykhhospodarskykh oznak [Evaluation of soybean varieties on a set of valuable economic characteristics]. Silske hospodarstvo ta lisivnytstvo – Agriculture and forestry. №. 12. S. 98–115. [in Ukrainian].

3.Shomali A., Aliniaeifard S. (2020). Overview of signal transduction in plantsunder salt and drought stresses. In Salt and Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany. Р. 231–258. [in English].

4.Signorelli S., Tarkowski Ł.P., O’leary B., Tabares-Da Rosa S., Borsani O.Monza J. (2021). GABA and Proline Metabolism in Response to Stress. Hormones and Plant Response. Vol. 10. P. 291–314. [in English].

5.Larouk C., Gabon F., Kehel Z., Djekoun A., Nachit M., Amri A. (2021).Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Drought Tolerance in a Mapping Population of Durum Wheat. Contemporary Agriculture. Vol. 70 (3–4). P. 123-134. [in English].

6.Dechant B., Ryu Y., Badgley G., Zeng Y., Berry J. A., Zhang Y., Goulas Y., LiZ., Zhang Q., Kang M., Li J., Moya I.. (2020). Canopy structure explains the relationship between photosynthesis and sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in crops. Remote Sensing of Environment. Vol. 241. e111733. [in English].

7.Brestic M, Zivcak M. (2013). PSII fluorescence techniques for measurement ofdrought and high temperature stress signal in plants: protocols and applications. In: Rout GR, Das AB (eds.) Molecular stress physiology of plants. Springer Dordrecht. Р. 87–131. [in English].

8.Kalaji H.M., Goltsev V.N., Żuk-Golaszewska K., Zivcak M., Brestic M.(2017). Chlorophyll Fluorescence. Understanding Crop Performance: Basics  and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton. 222 р. [in English].

9.Kalaji H.M., Bąba W., Gediga K., Goltsev V., Samborska I., Cetner M.D.,Dimitrova S., Piszcz U., Bielecki K., Karmowska K., Dankov K. & Kompała-Bąba A. (2017). Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool for nutrient status identification in rapeseed plants. Photosynthesis Research. 136, 329–343. [in English].

10.Stirbet A., Lazár D., Kromdijk J., Govindjee. (2018). Chlorophyll afluorescence induction: can just a one-second measurement be used to quantify abiotic stress responses? Photosynthetica. Vol. 56. P. 86–104. [in English].

11.Magney T.S., Barnes M.L., Yang X. (2020). On the covariation of chlorophyllfluorescence and photosynthesis across scales. Geophysical Research Letters. Vol. 47. e 2020GL091098. [in English].

12.Romanov V.O., Artemenko, D.M., Braiko Y.O. (2011). Family of portabledevices ‘Floratest’: preparation for serial production. Computer tools, networks and systems. № 10. P. 85–93. [in English].

13.Saiko V.F. (2011). Osoblyvosti provedennia doslidzhen z khrestotsvitymyoliinymy kulturamy [Features of research with cruciferous oilseeds]. K.: “Instytut zemlerobstva NAAN”. 76 s. [in Ukrainian].

14.CPVO. (2017). Protocol for tests on distinctness, uniformity and stability Raphanussativus L. var oleiformis Pers. Fodder radish (CPVO-TP/178/1). Geneva. 21 p. Available: https://cpvo.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/raphanus_oleiformis.pdf. [in English].

15.Hinnkelmann K., Kempthorne O. (2019). Design and Analysis ofExperiments. 10th Edition. Wiley and Sons. New York. 688 p. [in English].