Сільське господарство та лісівництво

Pankova Snizhana,  Doctor of Philosophy in Agronomy, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Forestry and Landscape Gardening, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University (21008, 3 Soniachna St., Vinnytsia, Ukraine; e-mail: pankovavnau@gmail.com ORCID: 0000-0002-5975-5251).

Piddubna Antonina,  Doctor of Philosophy in Agronomy, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Forestry and Landscape Gardening, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University (21008, 3 Soniachna St., Vinnytsia, Ukraine; e-mail: piddubnaantonina@gmail.com. ORCID: 0000-0002-0204-1338).

Yakovets Liudmyla, Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Botany, Genetics and Plant Protection at VNAU. (21008, Vinnytsia, 3 Sonyachna Street. e-mail: ludmila28334@gmail.com, +380982528334, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5283-7169).

Klymiuk Marian, Third-year Student, Specialty Forestry, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University (21008, 3 Soniachna St., Vinnytsia, Ukraine ORCID: 0009-0004-3115-3920).

Urban forest-park ecosystems are exposed to sustained recreational pressure, soil compaction, mechanical damage, pollution, altered microclimatic conditions, and competition within tree groups. These factors can reduce stand vitality and weaken ecological, recreational, protective, and aesthetic functions, thereby increasing the need for carefully differentiated management. The purpose of this study was to assess the initial structural and sanitary changes associated with selective landscape felling in a forest-park stand in Vinnytsia, Ukraine, and to determine whether the intervention preserved the principal features of the stand. Field investigations were conducted from spring to autumn 2025. Sixteen trees were inventoried before treatment; the principal species were European hornbeam (Carpinus betulus L.) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Landscape felling was performed in April 2025, and a repeated visual assessment was completed approximately six months later. Tree selection considered species, vitality, sanitary condition, stem and crown quality, visible damage, decorative value, competitive position, and the role of each tree as an accent, accompanying, background, or undesirable element of the landscape composition. Four of the 16 inventoried trees were removed, corresponding to a numerical felling intensity of 25.0%, whereas 12 trees (75.0%) were retained. Complete sanitary-condition records were available for 15 trees: 10 individuals (66.7%) were classified as healthy, three (20.0%) as weakened, and two (13.3%) as diseased. One tree lacked a complete sanitary record and was excluded from the calculation of category proportions. The post-treatment survey documented local opening around the retained trees and reduced crowding without loss of the general forest-park character. The intervention was therefore interpreted as moderate and selective rather than intensive. Because the exact plot area and complete repeated measurements of DBH, height, crown closure, crown dimensions, inter-tree distance, and light conditions were unavailable, stand density per hectare and statistical significance of structural changes were not calculated. Photographs were used only as qualitative supporting evidence. The results demonstrate the practical value of combining sanitary, biological, decorative, and spatial criteria when planning landscape fellings in urban forest parks. The differentiated approach made it possible to retain most trees while removing individuals whose condition or position reduced the quality of the stand. The findings should be regarded as an initial site-specific assessment rather than evidence of long-term ecological improvement. Further monitoring should be based on permanent sample plots of known area and repeated tree-level measurements of diameter, height, crown parameters, spacing, regeneration, sanitary condition, species composition, and microclimate. Such observations would clarify whether the recorded spatial changes persist and contribute to measurable improvements in tree vitality, biodiversity, recreational quality, and ecological stability.

1. Piddubna A.M., Matusiak M.V., Tsyhanska O.I., Pankova S.O. (2025). Influence of winter hole-covering technology on the agrochemical state of soil under tree plantations in the city of Vinnytsia. Ukrainian Journal of Natural Sciences, 13, 413–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/naturaljournal.13.2025.39  [in English].

2. Didur I., Tkachuk O., Pantsyreva H., Chabanuk Ya., Pankova S., Hutsol H., Mazur O., Kovka N. (2025). Bioindication characteristics of trees in solid protection forest strips depending on intensive agriculture. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 26(6), 315–328. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/202749  [in English].

3. Tkachuk O., Viter N., Pankova S., Titarenko O., Yakovets L. (2023). The current environmental state of the field protective forest belts of the Forest Steppe of Ukraine. International Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science, 13(2), 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31407/ijees13.201  [in English].

4. Neiko I.S., Mudrak H.V., Neiko O.V., Didur I.M., Matusiak M.V., Kozak Yu. V. (2022). Lisovi henetychni resursy u konteksti zberezhennia bioriznomanittia Vinnychchyny [Forest genetic resources in the context of biodiversity conservation in Vinnytsia region]. TVORY. [in Ukrainian].

5. Neiko I.S., Oplakanska A.B., Neiko S.O., Pankova S.O. (2024). Osoblyvosti funktsionuvannia lisonasinnievykh plantatsii duba zvychainoho (Quercus robur L.) v umovakh Pravoberezhnoho Lisostepu Ukrainy [Features of the functioning of English oak (Quercus robur L.) forest seed plantations in the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine]. Ahrarni innovatsii − Agrarian Innovations, 25, 129–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32848/agrar.innov.2024.25.20 [in Ukrainian].

6. Matusiak M.V. (2019). Doslidzhennia ta analiz skladu travianoho pokryvu fitotsenoziv m. Vinnytsia na prykladi okremykh dilianok lisoparku ta botanichnoho sadu VNAU [Research and analysis of the herbaceous vegetation composition of phytocenoses in Vinnytsia based on selected areas of the forest park and botanical garden of VNAU]. Molodyi vchenyi − Young Scientist, 3(67), 224–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32839/2304-5809/2019-3-67-47 [in Ukrainian].

7. Shyshchenko P.H., Denysyk H.I. (2024). Landshaftnyi analiz u suchasnomu rehionalnomu proiektuvanni [Landscape analysis in modern regional planning]. Landshaftoznavstvo − Landscape Science, 5 (1), 14–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31652/2786-5665-2024-5-6-14 [in Ukrainian].

8. Paquette A., Sousa-Silva R., Maure F., Cameron E., Belluau M., Messier C. (2021). Praise for diversity: A functional approach to reduce risks in urban forests. Urban Forestry Urban Greening, 62, 127157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127157  [in English].

9. Wang M., Zhang H., Fan S., Hao P., Dong L. (2021). A zoning-based solution for hierarchical forest patch mosaic in urban parks. Urban Forestry  Urban Greening, 65, 127352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127352  [in English].

10. Rasmussen S.M., Tinkham W.T., McHale M.R. (2022). What can a midsized, semi-arid city teach us about human-made forests? Urban Ecosystems, 25, 1217–1229. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-022-01203-0  [in English].

11. Przewoźna P., Mączka K., Mielewczyk M., Inglot A., Matczak P. (2022). Ranking ecosystem services delivered by trees in urban and rural areas. Ambio, 51, 2043–2057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01722-2  [in English].

12. Kotze D.J., Lowe E.C., MacIvor J.S., Ossola A., Norton B.A., Hochuli D.F. (2022). Urban forest invertebrates: How they shape and respond to the urban environment. Urban Ecosystems, 25, 1589–1609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-022-01240-9  [in English].

13. Wavrek M.T., Jean-Philippe S., McKinney M.L. (2023). Ecological and soil data applied to conservation management of an urban forest. Forests, 14(3), 487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f14030487  [in English].

14. McGann T.C., Schattman R.E., D’Amato A.W., Ontl T A. (2023). Climate adaptive management in the Northeastern United States: Common strategies and motivations of rural and urban foresters. Journal of Forestry, 121(2), 182–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvac039  [in English].

15. Cui J., Zhu M., Guo L., Zhang H., Hughes A.C., Wang H. (2023). Urban planning and green landscape management drive plant diversity in five tropical cities in China. Sustainability, 15(15), 12045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151512045  [in English].

16. Korohoda N.P. (2024). Indykatory ta rozrakhunkovi parametry v otsintsi ekosystemnykh posluh zi zberezhennia bioriznomanittia [Indicators and calculation parameters in the assessment of ecosystem services for biodiversity conservation]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. Heohrafiia − Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Geography, 1–2(88–89), 7–12. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2721.2024.88-89.1 [in Ukrainian].

17. Korohoda N.P. (2024). Otsinka efektyvnosti zelenykh zon u zberezhenni bioriznomanittia (na prykladi miskykh landshaftiv Kyieva) [Assessment of the effectiveness of green spaces in biodiversity conservation: A case study of urban landscapes in Kyiv]. Landshaftoznavstvo − Landscape Science. 5(1), 56–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31652/2786-5665-2024-5-56-66 [in Ukrainian].

18. Jeong J., Park C.-R. (2024). Urban forest indicator assessment for nature-based solutions to connect biodiversity and people. Ecological Indicators, 169, 112843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112843  [in English].

19. Hutt-Taylor K., Bassett C.G., Kinnunen R.P., Frei B. (2024). Existing evidence on the effect of urban forest management in carbon solutions and avian conservation: A systematic literature map. Environmental Evidence, 13, 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-024-00344-3  [in English].

20. Wang D., Xu P.-Y., An B.-W., Guo Q.-P. (2024). Urban green infrastructure: Bridging biodiversity conservation and sustainable urban development through adaptive management approach. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 1440477. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.1440477  [in English].

21. Edelkind-Vealey M., Ulyshen M.D., Braman S.K. (2024). Local factors influence the wild bee functional community at the urban-forest interface. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 1389619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.1389619  [in English].

22. Beckmann-Wübbelt A., Türk L., Almeida I., Fricke A., Sotirov M., Saha S. (2023). Climate change adaptation measures conflicted with the recreational demands on city forests during COVID-19 pandemic. npj Urban Sustainability, 3, 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-023-00096-y  [in English].

23. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (1995, July 27). Sanitarni pravyla v lisakh Ukrainy [Sanitary rules in the forests of Ukraine] (Resolution No. 555, as amended). DOI: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/555-95-%D0%BF [in Ukrainian].